<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ben Burns</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.donbest.com/wpmu1/benburns/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.donbest.com/wpmu1/benburns</link>
	<description>Just another Don Best Sports Blogs weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 06:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Total Bias - Week 2</title>
		<link>http://blogs.donbest.com/wpmu1/benburns/2008/09/11/total-bias-week-2/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.donbest.com/wpmu1/benburns/2008/09/11/total-bias-week-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 06:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Burns</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Football]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.donbest.com/wpmu1/benburns/?p=20</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 2008 regular season began with a defensive affair between the Giants and the Redskins. The defending champs prevailed by a score of 16-7. That set the stage for what would prove to be a relatively low-scoring Sunday. When the dust settled, eight of 13 Sunday games had finished &#8216;under&#8217; the total.
Both Monday night games [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 2008 regular season began with a defensive affair between the Giants and the Redskins. The defending champs prevailed by a score of 16-7. That set the stage for what would prove to be a relatively low-scoring Sunday. When the dust settled, eight of 13 Sunday games had finished &#8216;under&#8217; the total.</p>
<p>Both Monday night games went over the projected total leaving under bettors with a modest 9-7 advantage heading into Week 2, with the games averaging slightly more than 40 points each.</p>
<p>The Week 2 board features totals ranging from the mid-30s to the high 40s. The Monday Night game between the Cowboys and Eagles has the highest number, currently 46.5 or 47 at most books. Both teams put up big points in Week 1. Not surprisingly, the Raiders and Chiefs, a pair of teams which struggled to score, have the lowest total. The number came out at 34.5 but quickly climbed to 36. I&#8217;ve posted one opinion below. Enjoy the games and best of luck.</p>
<h3><strong><span style="color: #33cccc">Atlanta Falcons</span> at <span style="color: #33cccc">Tampa Bay Buccaneers</span> (37 1/2)</strong></h3>
<p><strong>Opinion: Under </strong></p>
<p>These teams both saw their opener finish above the total. The Bucs&#8217; game against the Saints snuck above the total with 44 combined points, while the Falcons combined with the Lions for a whopping 54. Those results have helped keep tonight&#8217;s total above the key number of 37, which I feel has provided us with solid value. A look at the recent meetings in this series show that all four games from the past two seasons produced 40 points or less. Those four games averaged just 29.5 points.</p>
<p>Give the Falcons credit for their opening day win. Everything went right and rookie QB Matt Ryan even threw a touchdown on his very first pass. That being said, Ryan and the Falcons will likely find things quite a bit tougher in their first road game.</p>
<p>The Bucs have gone under the total seven their last 11 home games and they&#8217;ve held six of their last nine opponents at Raymond James Stadium to 14 points or less. Additionally, Tampa Bay has seen the under go 6-2 in its last eight home games played in the month of September. Looking back further and we find the under at a profitable 38-20 in Tampa Bay&#8217;s last 58 September games overall.</p>
<p>The Bucs ran the ball effectively last week but Gruden became impatient with the rushing attack a little too early and they ended up throwing more passes than he probably would have liked. With Garcia banged-up, Brian Griese is expected to get the nod as the starting quarterback this week.</p>
<p>Regardless, I expect the Bucs to feature a larger percentage of run plays than they did last week. As for the Falcons, they threw just 13 passes last week to go along with their 42 plays on the ground. With Ryan still learning the offense and considering last week&#8217;s success, we should see another heavy dose of the run. As you know, running plays generally help to keep the clock moving.</p>
<p>The Bucs have shown a tendency to play relatively low-scoring games when listed as favorites. The under is 81-51-1 (61%) the last 133 times Tampa Bay&#8217;s been favored. Look for this contest to prove low scoring with the under improving to 16-5 the last 21 times that the Falcons played away from Atlanta. Consider the under at 37 or better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.donbest.com/wpmu1/benburns/2008/09/11/total-bias-week-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bad &#8220;Bullpen&#8221; Beats</title>
		<link>http://blogs.donbest.com/wpmu1/benburns/2008/09/03/bad-bullpen-beats/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.donbest.com/wpmu1/benburns/2008/09/03/bad-bullpen-beats/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 14:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Burns</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[MLB]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Baseball]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.donbest.com/wpmu1/benburns/?p=19</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I received several emails from readers this week which detailed various &#8216;bad beats.&#8217; It was a difficult choice about which one/s to print, as each story had merit. I decided to include both from a Canadian player named &#8216;Derek S.&#8217; Derek&#8217;s tale took the prize, largely because he had two heart-breakers on the same evening. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I received several emails from readers this week which detailed various &#8216;bad beats.&#8217; It was a difficult choice about which one/s to print, as each story had merit. I decided to include both from a Canadian player named &#8216;Derek S.&#8217; Derek&#8217;s tale took the prize, largely because he had two heart-breakers on the same evening. Both were underdogs which looked good nearly the entire way. However, in each case he was going against the top team in its league and in each case his bullpen let him down. Remember, if you&#8217;ve got a &#8216;bad beat&#8217; that you&#8217;d like to share, please email support@donbest.com with the details. Let&#8217;s take a closer look at Derek&#8217;s two heartbreakers.</p>
<p><strong>August 28<br />
Rangers at Angels</strong></p>
<p>Naturally, the Angels were heavily favored for this game. The line ranged from -170 to -180. However, it was the underdog Rangers who jumped off to an early 4-0 start against Jon Garland in the top of the first inning. Texas maintained its lead the entire way and had a 5-2 advantage heading into the bottom of eighth. The Angels have the best record in the American League for a reason though. Keyed by a pinch-hit three run double from Juan Rivera, they put five runs on the board. That gave them a 7-5 lead, heading to the ninth. Of course, with Francisco Rodriguez coming out of the bullpen that was &#8216;all she wrote&#8217; for the Rangers. Rodriguez worked a scoreless ninth, converting his 51st save in 56 tries. After the game, Rivera was quoted as saying: &#8220;We saw the rally monkey come out, and knew it was time&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>August 28<br />
Phillies at Cubs</strong></p>
<p>This matchup featured Cole Hamels for the Phillies vs. Ryan Dempster for the Cubs. While Hamels is a very good pitcher, Dempster is also having a very good year. Playing at home, where they&#8217;ve been superb all season, the Cubs came in as a -135 favorite. The Phillies managed a run in the top of the first. Note that they left the bases loaded. They maintained that 1-0 lead until the bottom of the fifth inning when the Cubs tied things up. The Phillies immediately answered though, scoring three in their half of the sixth to go up 4-1. It looked very much like they might spoil Chicago manager Lou Pinnela&#8217;s 65th birthday, as the Phillies carried that 4-1 lead into the bottom of the eighth inning. Like the Angels in the AL, the Cubs have been this year&#8217;s best National League team for good reason though.</p>
<p>With Hamels out of the game, the Cubs went to work on the Philadelphia bullpen. Ryan Madson started the inning and promptly gave up three hits (home run, double, single) without recording an out. Chad Durbin relieved him and walked Derrick Lee to load the bases. You can probably guess what happened next. Yep, grand-salami time! Aramis Ramirez came up and sent a 1-0 pitch deep into the seats. Philadelphia center fielder Shane Victorino hardly moved as the ball left the bat and the rest was history. With the Cubs up 6-4, Kerry Wood came in and closed the door in the ninth. It&#8217;s been a familiar story for Hamels, who surely wished that Charlie Manuel allowed him to pitch one more inning. For the season, he has a stellar 3.13 ERA and 1.03 WHIP. Pitching for one of the better hitting clubs in the National League, with those numbers, one would think he&#8217;d have a lot of wins to his credit. He&#8217;s only 11-8 though. After the game, Lou Pinella would comment: &#8220;What a great come-from-behind win. Just a great win. I mean, exciting. This place really got loud. &#8230; I don&#8217;t know if it was the loudest I&#8217;ve heard it, but let me tell you what, it was loud.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.donbest.com/wpmu1/benburns/2008/09/03/bad-bullpen-beats/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fantastic Friday card features FOUR powerful plays!</title>
		<link>http://blogs.donbest.com/wpmu1/benburns/2008/08/29/18/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.donbest.com/wpmu1/benburns/2008/08/29/18/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Burns</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Football]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.donbest.com/wpmu1/benburns/?p=18</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben&#8217;s remarkable NFL results over the past decade made him famous - he&#8217;s still ranked #1 (against a field of 150) in the entire history of one of the Internet&#8217;s longest running and most reputable sports monitors.
While he kick-started the 2008 season with another outstanding run on the Canadian gridiron, Burns knows more than just [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben&#8217;s remarkable NFL results over the past decade made him famous - <strong>he&#8217;s still ranked #1 (against a field of 150) in the entire history of one of the Internet&#8217;s longest running and most reputable sports monitors.</strong></p>
<p>While he kick-started the 2008 season with another outstanding run on the Canadian gridiron, Burns knows more than just pro football. Indeed, he&#8217;s coming off a <strong>simply awesome college football campaign</strong>, which saw him win from Opening Day and play with the house&#8217;s month the entire season. The pinnacle of the oustanding season came with his Game of the Year on Georgia over Hawaii, a <strong>41-10 wire-to-wire wipeout.</strong></p>
<p>With football in full swing, it&#8217;s a great time to consider one of our ALL-INCLUSIVE weekly or monthly passes, which get you ALL of Ben&#8217;s plays for an entire week ($175) or month for $400.</p>
<h1 style="font-size:130%"><strong>Today’s Free Pick</strong></h1>
<p>GAME:  Colorado Rockies @ San Diego Padres Aug 29, 2008 10:05PM<br />
SPORT: Major League Baseball Picks<br />
PICK: Colorado Rockies<br />
Offered at: -164 Belmont<br />
REASON FOR PICK: The Padres just did the Rockies a big favor by sweeping the Diamondbacks. That doesn&#8217;t mean that all is suddenly right in San Diego now though. Indeed, the Padres are still a dismal 51-82 on the season. That&#8217;s by far the worst mark in the division and ranks as the third worst mark in all of baseball. Remember last season&#8217;s magical run? Don&#8217;t look now but the Rockies are suddenly within six games of first place, having gone a healthy 24-15 since the All Star Break. Now they get to take on the lowly Padres while the two teams they are chasing, Arizona and LA, get to beat up on each other. In other words, this is a very important series.</p>
<p>Tonight offers a terrific chance for the Rockies to get things started with a victory. Despite a bit of a tough stretch recently, Cook has enjoyed an excellent season. In fact, he&#8217;s 15-8 with a 3.91 ERA. He has also dominated the Padres, going 8-2 with a stellar 2.05 ERA in 12 starts against them since 2004, including a 4-1 mark with an outstanding 1.50 ERA in six starts here at Petco Park.He&#8217;ll be opposed by Dirk Hayhurst, who is making just his second big league start. In fact, only two of Hayhurst&#8217;s 46 appearances at Triple-A Portland were starts. Hayhurst&#8217;s first start didn&#8217;t go particularly well, as he gave up three runs and five hits while lasting only four innings.</p>
<p>The fact that Hayhurst is a left-hander should also favor the visitors. The Rockies are 22-15 (+4.6) vs. southpaws on the season. They&#8217;re hitting .283 against them and averaging 5.8 runs. Conversely, the Padres are batting .252 against right-handers, averaging four runs per game. They&#8217;ve gone 36-50 in those games. Consider COLORADO<br />
Competing against a field of 150, Ben Burns ranks as the #1 NFL handicapper in the entire history of one of the Internet&#8217;s most respected sports monitors. Naturally he&#8217;s itching to get on to Opening Week. He&#8217;s got one more BIG PLAY from the preseason first though. If you liked the Redskins (47-3 WIN!) last week, you&#8217;ll LOVE this MONSTER!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.donbest.com/wpmu1/benburns/2008/08/29/18/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bad Beats: MLB heartbreakers</title>
		<link>http://blogs.donbest.com/wpmu1/benburns/2008/08/26/bad-beats-mlb-heartbreakers/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.donbest.com/wpmu1/benburns/2008/08/26/bad-beats-mlb-heartbreakers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 14:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Burns</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.donbest.com/wpmu1/benburns/?p=17</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Only three of this week&#8217;s first 15 NFLX games were decided by three points or less vs. the pointspread. As a group, the Week 3 pointspread winners covered by an average margin of 13.8 points. With the average Week 3 spread being covered by two touchdowns, there weren&#8217;t as many last second heartbreakers as usual.
Therefore, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only three of this week&#8217;s first 15 NFLX games were decided by three points or less vs. the pointspread. As a group, the Week 3 pointspread winners covered by an average margin of 13.8 points. With the average Week 3 spread being covered by two touchdowns, there weren&#8217;t as many last second heartbreakers as usual.</p>
<p>Therefore, for this week&#8217;s edition of &#8220;Bad Beats&#8221; we&#8217;ll be looking at a pair of tough losses (for some) from Sunday&#8217;s baseball slate. We&#8217;ll be having much bigger football cards from here on out, so there should be plenty of gridiron action to talk about. Remember, if you&#8217;d like to see your bad beat stories featured in next week&#8217;s column, email editorial@donbest.com and provide the details.</p>
<p>Devil Rays at White Sox</p>
<p>Sunday, August 24</p>
<p>Tampa Bay has broken plenty of bettors&#8217; hearts this season, with numerous late inning comeback victories. The Rays&#8217; luck temporarily ran out yesterday. On the verge of their first-ever three-game sweep at Chicago and also their first road sweep of an American League team this season, the Rays took a lead into the bottom of the ninth inning. Without injured closer Troy Percival available, Dan Wheeler was called upon to preserve the 4 -3 lead. With two outs there was a play at the plate. Ben Zobrist&#8217;s throw arrived in plenty of time to get pinch-runner Brian Anderson. However, it skipped off Tampa catcher Shawn Riggans and Anderson was able to score the tying run. That was just the beginning for Tampa Bay bettors though.</p>
<p>Fast forward to the bottom of the 10th inning and we find Chicago&#8217;s AJ Pierzynski caught in a rundown between second and third base. Even in little league, almost nobody escapes these type of plays, let alone at the major league level. In this case, Pierzynski appeared to be tagged but was awarded third base by second base umpire Doug Eddings, who claimed that Tampa&#8217;s third baseman Willy Aybar committed interference. The Rays complaints fell on deaf ears and Pierzynski eventually proved to be the winning run.</p>
<p>Interestingly, Eddings and Pierzynski have some previous history together, as they were at the center of a disputed call in the 2005 American League Championship series. You may recall the play. Pierzynski struck out in the ninth inning of that game but Eddings ruled the pitch had bounced in the dirt. The Angels ran off the field. Pierzynski hustled to first. The Sox rallied to win the game and the series.</p>
<p>As bad beats are subjective, Chicago bettors could argue that they actually deserved to win Sunday&#8217;s game, based on the fact that three of Tampa&#8217;s five runs were unearned. That would be a valid argument but I had the White Sox and I would still classify it as one of my luckier recent wins. At the very least, I know that if the shoe was on the other foot and I had a ticket on the underdog Rays, I would have felt rather unfortunate. Regardless, it&#8217;s important to remember that our &#8220;lucky&#8221; wins are someone else&#8217;s bad beats.</p>
<p>Dodgers at Phillies</p>
<p>Sunday, August 24</p>
<p>While football remains the king, Sunday night baseball games receive plenty of action. I didn&#8217;t personally play the Dodgers/Phillies game but I had several friends who did. While never exactly comfortable, Dodger backers felt pretty good the entire way considering their team jumped off to an early lead and their starting pitcher, Hiroki Kuroda, was nearly unhittable. </p>
<p>Kuroda finished having allowed two hits and one run through six complete innings. The Dodgers scored a run in the first inning and the Phillies tied in the fifth. The Dodgers reclaimed the lead (2-1) and carried it all the way to the bottom of the ninth inning. In fact, they were one out away from winning until Pedro Feliz delivered a game-tying single with two outs in the bottom of the ninth. That forced extra innings. It looked liked the Dodgers might bounce back as they loaded the bases with nobody out in the 10th inning but Chad Durbin shut the door right. The next inning, Feliz was again the hero delivering a walkoff three-run homer and sealing a 5-2 victory for Phillies. Bad beat for those who bet Dodgers? That&#8217;s open for debate and I&#8217;ll let you make the call. I know the couple of people I talked to who had the Dodgers sure weren&#8217;t too pleased though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.donbest.com/wpmu1/benburns/2008/08/26/bad-beats-mlb-heartbreakers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Total Bias - The Number 37</title>
		<link>http://blogs.donbest.com/wpmu1/benburns/2008/08/22/total-bias-the-number-37/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.donbest.com/wpmu1/benburns/2008/08/22/total-bias-the-number-37/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 17:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Burns</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.donbest.com/wpmu1/benburns/?p=16</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first two weeks of the preseason have seen plenty of points and if the opening game of Week 3 is any indication, we could see some more high-scoring contests this weekend.
Over bettors held a 10-7 advantage after the opening week, including the Hall of Fame game. Week 2 saw them extend their lead, as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first two weeks of the preseason have seen plenty of points and if the opening game of Week 3 is any indication, we could see some more high-scoring contests this weekend.</p>
<p>Over bettors held a 10-7 advantage after the opening week, including the Hall of Fame game. Week 2 saw them extend their lead, as 10 of 16 games eclipsed the total. Interestingly, it was the days with fewer games which were generally the highest scoring. The days with two or less games (Thursday, Friday, Sunday, Monday) saw the &#8216;over&#8217; go 5-1. Including last night&#8217;s 49&#8242;ers/Bears shootout, which sailed above the number with 67 combined points, the &#8216;over&#8217; is now 21-13 (61.8%) on the season.</p>
<p>Before looking at this weekend&#8217;s over/under card, let&#8217;s check some recent Week 3 stats to see how coaches have been treating the preseason&#8217;s &#8220;dress-rehearsal.&#8221; Looking back to last preseason and we find that Week 3 was relatively high-scoring with the games producing an average of 41.31 points. The &#8216;over&#8217; held a 9-6-1 advantage. However, before jumping blindly on the &#8216;over&#8217; bandwagon this weekend, note that the Week 3 scores were significantly lower in each of the previous two years, averaging less than 35.5 points per game. Overall, the 3-year scoring average for Week 3 games from 2005-2007 came in at 37.31 points.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll see the number 37 quite regularly during the next several months. In fact, if you&#8217;ve been following the games from an over/under perspective, you&#8217;ve already come across it several times. Two of the Week 1 games produced exactly 37 points and three of the Week 2 games fell exactly on that number. Note that three of the Week 3 games in the last two preseasons (2 in 2006, 1 in 2007) also landed directly on 37.</p>
<p>Knowing that 10 of 16 games produced 37 or more combined points in Week 3 of last preseason, this week&#8217;s complimentary selection is an &#8216;over.&#8217; It comes from a game which opened with an over/under line of 37.5 but which has since fallen below the key number of 37. As always, best of luck and if you can&#8217;t get at least as good a number as one which has been mentioned, I suggest passing.</p>
<p>
<b>Arizona at Oakland OVER (play at 37 or better)</b></p>
<p>This total opened at 37 or 37.5 but most shops now have it at 36.5. I feel that number is too low for a pair of non-conference foes which combined for 43 points last week. Both teams are hoping for strong games from their young quarterbacks. Former number one pick JaMarcus Russell was fairly solid last week, going 10-of-17 for 75 yards and a touchdown. That was on the road against a tough Tennessee defense which allowed 18.6 points per game last season and less than 200 passing yards per game. I managed a winning ticket with that &#8216;under&#8217; in that game (17-16 final) but expect Russell to enjoy more success this week. Not only is he now playing at home, but he&#8217;ll also be facing an Arizona defense which allowed 24.9 points per game last season and which was below average in defending the pass. Note that Cardinals&#8217; safety Antrel Rolle is unlikely to play. While he isn&#8217;t likely to see much action, it&#8217;s still worth mentioning that backup QB Andrew Walter has been sharp and appears capable of leading the Oakland offense to some fourth quarter points. The Cardinals put up 27 points at KC last week. They&#8217;ve seen Matt Leinart convert more than 73% of his passes through the first two week, going 14-of-19. Meanwhile, Warner got the start last week and completed six of nine passes while leading the team on a touchdown drive. Naturally, a little quarterback competition is generally healthy when trying to cash a preseason over ticket. Even without receiver Anquan Boldin, Leinart and Warner aren&#8217;t without weapons.</p>
<p>These teams also faced each other here last preseason. That game finished well above the number with a final score of 27-23, in favor of the Raiders. It was the second highest scoring game of what was otherwise a relatively low-scoring opening week. Don&#8217;t be surprised if this one proves higher scoring than most are expecting once again. Consider the Over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.donbest.com/wpmu1/benburns/2008/08/22/total-bias-the-number-37/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Burns&#8217; Bad Beats: NFL preseason stings</title>
		<link>http://blogs.donbest.com/wpmu1/benburns/2008/08/20/burns-bad-beats-nfl-preseason-stings/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.donbest.com/wpmu1/benburns/2008/08/20/burns-bad-beats-nfl-preseason-stings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 17:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Burns</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.donbest.com/wpmu1/benburns/?p=15</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have been asked to bring back a column which I used to run, called &#8220;Bad Beats.&#8221; As the name implies, the focus will be on sports betting losses which were particularly hard to swallow.
You know the kind I&#8217;m talking about. Everyone does, beginners and seasoned pros alike. These type of agonizing defeats are an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been asked to bring back a column which I used to run, called &#8220;Bad Beats.&#8221; As the name implies, the focus will be on sports betting losses which were particularly hard to swallow.</p>
<p>You know the kind I&#8217;m talking about. Everyone does, beginners and seasoned pros alike. These type of agonizing defeats are an unfortunate and inevitable part of wagering. Don&#8217;t forget that, like beauty, bad beats are in the eye of the beholder. In other words, each time that you experience an unlucky loss, keep in mind that someone else is enjoying a fortunate victory. More importantly, remember that these things have a way of evening themselves out over the longrun. That being said, some gamblers have a tendency to forget about the lucky wins while remembering the unfortunate defeats for much longer.</p>
<p>This will be a weekly feature here and your participation is encouraged. If you&#8217;d like to share a story about one of your more excruciating losses, email editorial@donbest.com. Please provide as many details as possible and stick to (recent) football stories only. This week, we&#8217;ll look at a pair of promising looking &#8216;under&#8217; tickets which both went bad in the fourth quarter. As this is the first issue of the year and the term may be new to some, we&#8217;ll start by defining what a bad beat actually means.</p>
<p>Definition: In the world of sports-betting, the term bad beat refers to a heart-breaking gambling loss, most often occurring when a late score or fluke play changes the betting outcome of the side or total. In poker, bad beat is a term for a hand which lost, even though the cards appeared to be strong. It typically occurs where one player bets the clearly stronger hand and the opposing player makes a poor call that eventually &#8220;hits&#8221; and wins. In both poker and sports, the term is subjective. Therefore, you&#8217;ll sometimes find that players/bettors will disagree about whether a particular hand or game was a bad beat.</p>
<p>Carolina at Philadelphia</p>
<p>Thursday, August 14</p>
<p>Under bettors appeared to be looking very good in this one. The field was sloppy and the offenses were even sloppier. The score was 10-0 for Carolina entering the fourth quarter. With a line of +3 or +3.5, those backing the Panthers felt pretty good about their chances. With the offenses having done so little, those with &#8216;under&#8217; tickets (line ranged from 35.5 to 36.5) felt even more confident. Everything changed when the Eagles&#8217; backups outscored the Panthers&#8217; backups by score of 24-3 in the fourth quarter though. The final blow occurred when the Eagles ran back an interception 74 yards for a touchdown with less than 30 seconds to play. Not only did that ensure the pointspread victory by snuffing out the Panthers&#8217; drive, it also caused the final score (24-13) to sneak above the total. Tough loss for Carolina. Bad beat for those who took the under.</p>
<p>Detroit at Cincinnati</p>
<p>Sunday, August 17</p>
<p>As already mentioned, bettors will sometimes disagree as to what qualifies as a bad beat. This makes discussing these &#8220;borderline bad beats&#8221; even more interesting. The &#8216;under&#8217; in the Lions/Bengals game wasn&#8217;t among the worst bad beats that we&#8217;ll discuss this season and probably falls into the borderline category. It was my toughest loss of the weekend though and I wanted to include one of my own personal tickets. I was enjoying a nice Sunday afternoon, as I&#8217;d already won all three of my baseball plays. My chances of winning with Cincinnati and Detroit &#8216;under&#8217; and completing the 4-0 sweep seemed reasonably good, as the Lions and Bengals were involved in a defensive affair, tied 10-10 in the fourth. With the Lions up 13-10 with six minutes remaining, at midfield, and seemingly content to keep running on every play, things were starting to look even better. However, just when everyone (including the Bengals secondary) was expecting another run play, Drew Stanton came out of nowhere with a 50 yard play-action touchdown pass. Fast forward a few minutes and we find that the Lions, now up 20- 10, were at third and one at the Bengals&#8217; 10 yard line. If they pick up the first down, they most likely just take a knee on the next three plays and run out the clock. No such luck - Stanton ran a bootleg and the confused Bengals allowed him to walk in, untouched from 10 yards out. So much for the sweep!</p>
<p>Looking Ahead</p>
<p>Bad beats, by their very nature, are unpredictable. Therefore, one can&#8217;t really point to a particular game and say, &#8220;watch for a bad beat in this one.&#8221; However, it is worth mentioning that both of the above &#8216;under&#8217; losses came with games that had closing totals of less than 37, both of which finished with final combined scores of exactly 37. I often discuss the importance of the number 37 in the NFL and will re-visit that topic in this week&#8217;s &#8220;Total Bias&#8221; column.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.donbest.com/wpmu1/benburns/2008/08/20/burns-bad-beats-nfl-preseason-stings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ben Burns&#8217; update</title>
		<link>http://blogs.donbest.com/wpmu1/benburns/2008/08/08/ben-burns-update-2/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.donbest.com/wpmu1/benburns/2008/08/08/ben-burns-update-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 14:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Burns</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Footbal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.donbest.com/wpmu1/benburns/?p=13</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NFLX goes 2-0 on Thursday - #1 TOTAL OF THE WEEK headlines FANTASTIC Friday card!
Documented NFL Champion Ben Burns CRUSHED the books last preseason and he kicked-off Week 1 by cashing BOTH his NFLX picks yesterday. That included an outright winner on the Ravens AND a relatively easy winner with the &#8216;under&#8217; in the Lions/Giants [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>NFLX goes 2-0 on Thursday - #1 TOTAL OF THE WEEK headlines FANTASTIC Friday card!</h3>
<p>Documented NFL Champion Ben Burns CRUSHED the books last preseason and he kicked-off Week 1 by cashing BOTH his NFLX picks yesterday. That included an outright winner on the Ravens AND a relatively easy winner with the &#8216;under&#8217; in the Lions/Giants contest.</p>
<p>The winner on Baltimore brought Ben to a PERFECT 5-0 with his weekly Thursday Night &#8220;Roasts&#8221; this football season (first four were in the CFL) while the over/under winner brought him to a rock solid 8-3 his last 11 &#8220;Blue Chip&#8221; releases. Today, Burns is stepping out with his #1 NFLX Total of the Week.</p>
<p>With all the excitement involving the return of the NFL, we don&#8217;t want to forget about the CFL though - particularly not when Ben is hitting a sizzling 69% (9-4) on the season. He&#8217;s released only one play from Week 7, his #1 Game of the Week, and it&#8217;s available right now!</p>
<p>With football now officially in full swing, it&#8217;s a great time to consider one of our ALL-INCLUSIVE weekly or monthly passes, which get you ALL of Ben&#8217;s plays for an entire week ($175) or month for $400.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.donbest.com/wpmu1/benburns/2008/08/08/ben-burns-update-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ben Burns&#8217; update</title>
		<link>http://blogs.donbest.com/wpmu1/benburns/2008/08/07/ben-burns-update/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.donbest.com/wpmu1/benburns/2008/08/07/ben-burns-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 19:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Burns</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Football]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.donbest.com/wpmu1/benburns/?p=12</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NFLX &#8220;Blue Chip&#8221; Total kicks-off at 7:00 ET. Thursday &#8220;Roasts&#8221; are 4-0 YTD!
Week 1 of the Preseason kicks-off today and Documented NFL Champion Ben Burns is fully ready. Ben CRUSHED the books last preseason. and he began his commanding NFLX campaign by going a PERFECT 4-0 with his over/under picks in the H.O.F game and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>NFLX &#8220;Blue Chip&#8221; Total kicks-off at 7:00 ET. Thursday &#8220;Roasts&#8221; are 4-0 YTD!</strong></p>
<p>Week 1 of the Preseason kicks-off today and Documented NFL Champion Ben Burns is fully ready. Ben CRUSHED the books last preseason. and he began his commanding NFLX campaign by going a PERFECT 4-0 with his over/under picks in the H.O.F game and the Opening Round. Today, this renowned &#8220;Totals Expert&#8221; releases his first total of the &#8216;08 season. This top tier ticket is available now and it kick&#8217;s off on Thursday at 7:00 ET. Even better, it&#8217;s received &#8220;Blue Chip Status!&#8221;</p>
<p>Speaking of 4-0, Ben has already gone a PERFECT 4-0 with his weekly Thursday Night &#8220;Roasts&#8221; this football season, part of a stellar 9-4 mark overall with his Canadian football selections. Winner #5 comes from today&#8217;s preseason slate. This BEAUTY kicks-off at 7:30 ET.</p>
<p>Ben also has a pair of baseball plays available today, including his latest &#8220;Personal Favorite.&#8221; Note that his PF&#8217;s are now on a 13-7 run. First pitch goes EARLY so make sure not to sleep in!</p>
<p>With football now officially in full swing, it&#8217;s a great time to consider one of our ALL-INCLUSIVE weekly or monthly passes, which get you ALL of Ben&#8217;s plays for an entire week ($175) or month for $400.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.donbest.com/wpmu1/benburns/2008/08/07/ben-burns-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Betting Totals in the Preseason: Which Week Produces the Most Points?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.donbest.com/wpmu1/benburns/2008/07/30/betting-totals-in-the-preseason-which-week-produces-the-most-points/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.donbest.com/wpmu1/benburns/2008/07/30/betting-totals-in-the-preseason-which-week-produces-the-most-points/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 05:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Burns</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Football]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.donbest.com/wpmu1/benburns/?p=11</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Successful NFL bettors understand that there is a significant difference between handicapping preseason football games and handicapping regular season ones. During the regular season, with so much importance attached to each and every game, coaches adopt a &#8220;win at all costs&#8221; mentality. However, those same coaches typically have vastly different objectives during the preseason. While [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Successful NFL bettors understand that there is a significant difference between handicapping preseason football games and handicapping regular season ones. During the regular season, with so much importance attached to each and every game, coaches adopt a &#8220;win at all costs&#8221; mentality. However, those same coaches typically have vastly different objectives during the preseason. While some coaches emphasize winning preseason games more than others, all of them want to give their starters enough time to shake off the rust from the offseason while at the same time avoiding injury. Additionally, the coaches want and need to evaluate the second and third-stringers. The difference in coaches&#8217; goals means that non-starters typically receive plenty of playing time in the preseason. This is particularly true of Week 1, when stars generally only play for a series or two, or sometimes not at all. These non-starters have often only practiced the various offensive and defensive schemes for a few weeks. Naturally, this has a major impact on the game and it&#8217;s eventual outcome. This week, I&#8217;ll be focusing on the final scores of preseason games from the past couple of seasons, breaking those scores down from a week by week standpoint. For the purposes of this article, I&#8217;ve included the &#8220;Hall of Fame Game&#8221; as part of Week 1 of the preseason.</p>
<p>Most coaches and players will agree that it&#8217;s harder to learn the offensive schemes than it is the defensive ones. New quarterbacks have a ton to learn. They need to adjust to the faster speed of the game, while learning to read the defenses under pressure. Receivers need to learn routes and develop chemistry with quarterbacks, whom they may not have played with before. Meanwhile, the offensive linemen need to coordinate blocking against potential blitzes, while trying to work themselves into game shape. The effect of this is that defenses are often ahead of the offenses in the preseason, particularly in the first couple of weeks. Therefore, as one would expect, scores of preseason games tend to be lower than scores in the regular season.</p>
<p>Oddsmakers are well aware that preseason scores are lower. As a result, adjustments are made and over/under lines are also lower. However, for the first several years of this millennium, those numbers weren&#8217;t adjusted quite enough, as roughly 55% of the preseason games from 2000-2006 fell below the total. As someone who typically plays more &#8216;unders&#8217; than &#8216;overs,&#8217; this six year &#8216;under&#8217; trend suited me just fine. All good things must come to an end though and the oddsmakers and markets eventually adjusted accordingly. Week 1 of the 2006 preseason saw the &#8216;under&#8217; go a profitable 12-4-1. The following three weeks were almost exactly even, with the &#8216;under&#8217; going 24-23-1. The 2007 preseason also got off to a mildly profitable start for &#8216;under&#8217; bettors. Excluding one game which landed right on the number, nine of 16 game fell below the number. The &#8216;over&#8217; bounced back in a big way in the second and third weeks though. Despite 11 of the 16 Week 4 games staying below the total, the &#8216;over&#8217; held a slight 33-30-3 advantage for the four weeks combined.</p>
<p>As I&#8217;ve already mentioned, coaches have different goals in the summer than they do in the fall. Those objectives also vary with each individual week of the preseason. The starters see more playing time in Week 2, than they do in the opening week. In Week 3, the starters see their most playing time, often the entire first half or longer. Different coaches have different philosophies about the final week of the preseason. Sometimes, the way they handle Week 4 is dependant on how their team performed the previous week. If everything went relatively smoothly in Week 3, the starters typically see very little playing time in the preseason finale. However, a new coach on a team that is winless, or which struggled in Week 3, may elect to give his starters more playing time in Week 4. The reason for this being that they&#8217;d like to &#8220;right the ship&#8221; before the &#8220;real thing&#8221; kicks-off in September. Regardless, starters almost always see the most playing time in Week 3.</p>
<p>Due to each week of the preseason being treated so differently, it&#8217;s imperative to also handicap each week differently. This holds true for both &#8217;sides&#8217; and &#8216;totals.&#8217; Beneath, I&#8217;ve broken down the final scores, on a week by week basis, from the previous three (2005-2007) preseasons. In addition to providing the average scores from each week, I&#8217;ve also noted how many of the games fell above, below and on the key numbers of 34 and 37. One might hypothesize that Week 3 would be the highest-scoring, as that&#8217;s when the starters see the most playing time. Interestingly, over the three years of the case study, that didn&#8217;t prove to be the case. In fact, Week 2 was by far the highest-scoring. Week 3 came next, followed by Week 4. Not surprisingly, the opening week saw the fewest point scored.</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline">Week 1</span></strong></p>
<p>From 2005-2007, the final combined scores of the Week 1 games averaged just 33.4 points.</p>
<p><strong>2005</strong></p>
<p>Thanks in part to a pair of extremely high-scoring games from &#8220;Hall of Fame Week,&#8221; (Hall of Fame Game + a game at Tokyo) 2005 saw the highest average of the three year period, with it&#8217;s Week 1 games averaging 37.88 points. Ten of 18 games stayed below the key number of 37 with one game landing right on 37. Nine games finished above 34 though with two games landing directly on that number.</p>
<p><strong>2006</strong></p>
<p>The opening week of the 2006 preseason was an extremely low-scoring one. In fact, the 17 games averaged just 31.94 points. Not surprisingly, the &#8216;under&#8217; was a profitable 12-4-1. Thirteen games produced less than 37 points while 10 games fell below the 34 mark. On game landed directly on 34.</p>
<p><strong>2007</strong></p>
<p>Last preseason, the Week 1 games averaged 33.47 points. Eleven games fell below the 37 mark, while 10 of them produced less than 34 points.</p>
<p>********************************************</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline">Week 2</span></strong></p>
<p>From 2005-2007, the final combined scores of the Week 2 games averaged 40.15 points.</p>
<p><strong>2005</strong></p>
<p>The Week 2 games in 2005 produced an average of exactly 41 points. Three of the 16 games landed directly on the key number of 34 with 11 of the games finishing above that mark. One game finished with 37 points with nine finishing with more than 37.</p>
<p><strong>2006</strong></p>
<p>The 16 games played in Week 2 of the 2006 preseason produced an average of 36.88 points. Half of the games finished above 34 points while the other half finished below that mark. One game landed directly on the key number of 37 with nine games staying beneath that mark.</p>
<p><strong>2007</strong></p>
<p>Of the 12 weeks analyzed in this study, the second week of the 2007 proved to be the highest scoring. The games averaged a whopping 42.56 points. Twelve of 16 games produced greater than 34 points while 11 of the games finished above the 37 mark. One game landed directly on 37. Note that the &#8216;over&#8217; was a profitable 12-4.</p>
<p>********************************************</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline">Week 3</span></strong></p>
<p>From 2005-2007, the final combined scores of the Week 3 games averaged 37.31 points.</p>
<p><strong>2005</strong></p>
<p>Despite a couple of high-scoring games which bumped up the average, the 16 games played in Week 3 of the preseason averaged only 35.44 points. Eleven games stayed below the key number of 37 while 10 of them produced less than 34.</p>
<p><strong>2006</strong></p>
<p>Week 3 of the 2006 preseason saw the 16 games average 35.19 points. Half finished below 34 points and the other half finished above that mark. Two games landed directly on the key number of 37 with eight of the games producing less than that amount.</p>
<p><strong>2007</strong></p>
<p>The &#8216;over&#8217; was 9-6-1 in Week 3 last preseason, as the games produced an average of 41.31 points. Ten of 16 games produced more than 34 points with one landing right on that number. Nine of 16 games finished with greater than 37 combined points, once again with one game falling directly on that number.</p>
<p>********************************************</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline">Week 4</span></strong></p>
<p>From 2005-2007, the final combined scores of the Week 4 games averaged 34.94 points.</p>
<p><strong>2005</strong></p>
<p>The final week of the 2005 preseason proved to be relatively high-scoring with the 16 games averaging 40.19 points. Twelve finished with more than 34 points while 11 finished above the 37 mark. One game landed directly on 37.</p>
<p><strong>2006</strong></p>
<p>The final week of the 2006 preseason produced an average of 34.63 points. Eight of the 16 games produced less than 37 combined points with the same eight games also finishing below the 34 mark. Four games finished with exactly 37 combined points.</p>
<p><strong>2007</strong></p>
<p>Of the 12 weeks analyzed, Week 4 of the 2007 preseason proved to be the lowest-scoring. In fact, the 16 games averaged a mere 30 points with the &#8216;under&#8217; going a profitable 11-5. Eleven games finished below 37 points with one producing exactly 37. The same 11 games also all finished with less than 34.</p>
<p><em>Ben Burns&#8217; football picks are truly legendary. In fact, competing against a field of 150 of the biggest names in the industry at one of the Internet&#8217;s longest running and most respected sports monitors, where he had his selectiond documented for eight seasons, Ben has a commanding lead over the competition, as the <strong>#1 ranked NFL Handicapper of All-time!</strong></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.donbest.com/wpmu1/benburns/2008/07/30/betting-totals-in-the-preseason-which-week-produces-the-most-points/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Five Teams to Pay Attention to in the Preseason</title>
		<link>http://blogs.donbest.com/wpmu1/benburns/2008/07/28/five-teams-to-pay-attention-to-in-the-preseason/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.donbest.com/wpmu1/benburns/2008/07/28/five-teams-to-pay-attention-to-in-the-preseason/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 05:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Burns</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.donbest.com/wpmu1/benburns/?p=10</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Preseason football is nearly upon us, which means the &#8220;best&#8221; time of the sports year is just around the corner. Organizations have spent the spring and summer making changes to try and improve their football team. A year ago, two teams that received among the most accolades for improving their personnel were the 49ers and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Preseason football is nearly upon us, which means the &#8220;best&#8221; time of the sports year is just around the corner. Organizations have spent the spring and summer making changes to try and improve their football team. A year ago, two teams that received among the most accolades for improving their personnel were the 49ers and Patriots, both with several key additions. The 49&#8242;ers were so confident of their moves that they gave the Pats their number one pick in the 2008 draft. Note that the 49&#8242;ers went 1-3 in the preseason, including losses in each of their final two games. New England lost its first two preseason games. However, when the starters saw some more playing time, they closed out the preseason on a 2-0 run, including a convincing 24-7 win at Carolina in Week 3, when the starters typically get the most playing time of any preseason week. The Patriots went 18-1, the 49ers went 5-11. In other words, some changes work out, some don&#8217;t!</p>
<p>As usual, every team has made at least a few changes - some more than others. Here&#8217;s a brief look at five teams which made some key moves. Keep an eye on how these changes affect their various teams in the preseason. For starters, there&#8217;s real money to be made in the preseason. Additionally, even though the star players generally don&#8217;t get all that much playing time, one can still often gain valuable insight as to how the various changes might work out for their respective teams once the regular season begins.</p>
<p>San Francisco 49ers:The pressure is on Mike Nolan after a disastrous 2007 season. To change an anemic offense the 49&#8242;ers hired Mike Martz, the former Rams head coach who favors wide-open, spread offenses. This will be a sharp departure from the last two years where the 49ers were plodding and predictable on offense, mainly with RB Frank Gore up the middle. Veteran WR Isaac Bruce joins the team, teaming up with Martz again, while WR Ashley Lelie was seen running reverses in practice, so expect a very different 49er offensive look. The real question is: Who will be behind center? Former top pick Alex Smith had a falling out with Nolan and is working his way back from a separated shoulder. Backup QB Shaun Hill (5 TDs, 1 pick) was impressive last season, while J.T. O&#8217;Sullivan, who Martz knows from Detroit, is also in the mix. As you know, teams with quarterbacks battling for the starting job can often provide some value during the preseason.</p>
<p>Nolan had all three working out in summer practice. &#8220;Alex is very athletic,&#8221; Nolan said. &#8220;He probably has the strongest arm of all the guys. Now he&#8217;s got to go in there and put in four quarters and move the ball consistently and make plays he should make.&#8221; Asked if Smith has the edge, Nolan replied, &#8220;I wouldn&#8217;t go there right now.&#8221; QB Hill tends to play better in games than he shows in practice: &#8220;Shaun&#8217;s been OK in practice, but he&#8217;s that type of player,&#8221; noted Nolan. The coaches like O&#8217;Sullivan competitiveness and the fact that he learned Martz’s system last year in Detroit. Look for a heated battle in preseason between those three, plus a more aggressive offense under Martz, even in August, as they learn his new bag of tricks.</p>
<p>Baltimore Ravens: Brian Billick had a reputation as a fierce competitor and as someone who always liked to win, regardless of whether or not a game was &#8216;meaningless.&#8217; An anemic offense cost Billick his job though and there’s an old wagering adage that says to take a look at new coaches in preseason. while it seems rather simplistic, the logic is that new coaches typically want to show fans (and upper management) that they were the right pick for the job. Therefore, they want wins, even in preseason. John Harbaugh is the new head coach, the former Philadelphia Eagles secondary coach. Cam Cameron comes in as the new offensive coordinator and he&#8217;ll have a trio of quarterbacks battling to direct his preferred vertical passing game. Kyle Boller figures to have the inside track but he&#8217;s just 18-21 as a starter. He&#8217;ll be fighting off former Ohio State star, Troy Smith, along with rookie QB Joe Flacco from Delaware along. The 6-foot-6 Flacco, the team&#8217;s 1st round pick, has a big arm and is the highest quarterback ever drafted by the Ravens. Harbaugh was quoted as saying: &#8220;We said all along that the quarterback job is going to be an open competition. Whoever gives us the best chance to win, I think is going to be our quarterback.&#8221;</p>
<p>Minnesota Vikings: Minnesota has been built from the inside out, with exceptional line play on both sides of the ball. They were number one defensively against the run last season. On the other side of the ball, they had a power running game last season with a strong offensive line and running back Adrian Peterson. Now about those skill positions? The Vikings will be interesting as they give young QB Tavaris Jackson some speedy help. They added wide receiver Bernard Berrian from the Bears, a speed-burner alongside second-year WR Sidney Rice, who is also fast. While Jackson should enter the season as the unquestioned starter, the Vikings did bring in backup Gus Frerotte to back him up. (Note that Jackson had three more interceptions than touchdowns last season.) John David Booty will compete with Brooks Bollinger to become the third-stringer.</p>
<p>New Orleans Saints: New Orleans is a team of extremes: Great offense (when healthy), bad defense (when healthy or not). Not surprisingly, they made almost all their offseason moves at upgrading a terrible defense that ranked 26th overall and 30th against the pass. The Saints added defensive end Bobby McCray along with veteran linebackers Jonathan Vilma and Dan Morgan. The secondary saw the additions of Randall Gay and Arron Glenn. They also added Indiana cornerback Tracy Porter with their second round pick int he draft. Speaking of the draft, they moved up to take USC nose tackle Sedrick Ellis with the 7th overall pick, along with DT DeMario Pressley (5th round, NC State) They hope cornerback Mike McKenzie will be ready to go. He tore a ligament in his right knee late last season and is &#8216;rehabbing.&#8217; They didn&#8217;t completely ignore the offense though, as they recently traded for tight-end Jeremy Shockey. When healthy, Shockey can have a major effect on a game. He won the &#8216;Rookie of the Year&#8217; award in 2002 and has been selected to play in four Pro Bowls.</p>
<p>Jacksonville Jaguars: One gets the sense that Jacksonville is slowly moving from a power defensive team to a wide-open offensive one. Jacksonville has a new defensive coordinator in Gregg Williams, who was with the Redskins last fall under Joe Gibbs. The problem is they lost DT Marcus Stroud in free agency and defensive end Bobby McCray went to the Saints. Looking to get pressure on the likes of Manning and Brady, they did grab two of the draft&#8217;s best pass rushers though, Derrick Harvey and Quentin Groves. On offense, they rewarded quarterback David Garrard with a longterm contract and immediately upgraded his receiving corps by adding WR Jerry Porter from the Raiders, who is being penciled in as the No. 1 receiver. Not satisfied, they also acquired speedster Troy Williamson. You may recall that the Jaguars closed out the 2007 preseason with three straight wins, each of those victories coming by more than a touchdown.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.donbest.com/wpmu1/benburns/2008/07/28/five-teams-to-pay-attention-to-in-the-preseason/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
