IMO, one of the greatest appeals of MMA over boxing has been the general excellence of the judging. Since becoming a fan of MMA two years ago and watching virtually every match of every Pay-Per-View, I can’t remember one outright highway robbery or even one controversial decision. Big names are not saved from bad performances to preserve big money matchups down the line. Even when I personally may not have agreed with an outcome, a solid argument could have been made for the other side …….. until Saturday night’s Light-Heavyweight Championship fight between Forrest Griffin and Quinton “Rampage” Jackson.
Crowd favorite Griffin won a lopsided unanimous decision, the judges scoring it 49-46, 48-46, 48-46. In all honesty, I can’t imagine what fight they were watching, especially the judge that had it 49-46 or 4-1 Griffin.
Tha Mack Attack had the fight a 47-47 draw. Here is my recap.
Round One: Griffin set the tone of the fight with a sustained kick attack. Rampage decked Griffin with an uppercut and dominated the final minute and a half. Jackson 10-9.
Round Two: Griffin did some major damage at the start with two perfectly placed sidekicks behind the knee. Griffin took Rampage down, was able to mount the champ and pummel him with strikes and elbows for the next four-and-a-half minutes. A dominant round by Griffin, 10-8.
Round Three: UHC title fight are five five-minute rounds rather than the standard three five-minute rounds. Generally the third round is the round where both fighters take a blow and this was no exception. Five minutes of stand up with Jackson continuosly stalking and connecting with the better shots. Clearly 10-9 Jackson.
Round Four: Both fighters traded strikes. Jackson was able to take Griffin down and set him up for his famous Power Bomb that really did not connect. Jackson also nailed the challenger with a solid body shot right on the liver and busted open Griffen’s left eye with less than 30 seconds left. 10-9 Jackson.
Round Five: The two stood toe-to-toe and traded strikes, both apparently thinking they had the fight in hand. Not much action. In my eyes, Griffin appeared to be the fresher crisper fighter and that won him the round. You certainly could have given it to Jackson.
The DMack card had it 10-9, 8-10, 10-9, 10-9, 9-10 for 47-47, three rounds to two for Jackson.
I’m not sure I agree with the old adage that to take the belt away from the champion, you have to knock him out but ……….. you do have to beat him convincingly and that was clearly not the case here. Rampage was certianly not sharp off a nine month layoff but took the fight to Griffin in all but the second round.
There was very little complaining about the decision except from some of the more knowledgeable UHC beat writers at ringside and those that held tickets on Jackson, a solid 5-2 favorite. Jackson himself was a gentleman and consummate company man.
Scoring it a draw myself, I probably have little case for Jackson. I can only say that IMO, all three judges were way off base and can only hope that this was a one-time thing rather than a trend for the future.
Any thoughts ???
Posted by on 07-07-2008 |
No Comments